Saturday, November 10, 2007

Support or refute: In going too war against Mexico, President Polk was taking into account the best interests of the United States.

About twenty years before James K. Polk became president of the United States, Mexico had just gained there independence from Spain. Yearning to draw new settlers into the inhabited northern part, the Mexicans introduced a system of landownership which became extremely favorable to the United States. Not long after thousands of southerners began streaming into Texas and northerner Mexico, soon outnumbering Mexican inhabitants. The American continued to resettle in Mexico despite the new stipulations which required all the settlers to convert to Catholicism to abolish slavery. When most settlers disregarded the laws Mexico halted immigration. American settlers were unfazed by this action taken against them so they continuously poured in. The dispute became a huge controversy when General Antonio proclaimed himself as dictator of Mexico. Settlers declared independence created a government and selected a commander of the Texas military. There independence was guaranteed after the Battle of San Jacinto. In James K. Polk term as president he had numerous ideas for territorial expansion. In going to war against Mexico, president Polk was taking into account the best interest of the United States, he wanted to settle the Oregon border and to acquire California and the incorporation of Texas. The Mexican-American War was for territorial expansion.


During the presidential term of Polk he was an advocate for territorial expansion which was the objective of the U.S government from its inception. With the incorporation on of Texas to get into the Union it was not highly difficult considering most Texans supported U.S statehood. John Tyler also who had already paved the way for Texas statehood. The acquiring of Texas did not have all the support from people even though it was a plan for expanding of the U.S. While Polk was in his term a slave free-state was in operation and accepting Texas would set off a controversy between regions and their politicians. Despite the strong opposition from anti-slavery forces, Texas was admitted in the U.S. Even though he set a slave state his main interest was in the United States needs.


With the Oregon question, it was resolved around the same time relations with Mexico were unraveling. In the Webster-Ashburton Treaty the U.S and Britain settled the boundary disputes between Maine and Canada and then agreed to suppress slave trade. (Polk did want to end slavery) The disputes began again over the Oregon Territory’s northern border. Polk was determined to expand else where so he devised a alternative the forty ninth parallel as a divider line, once rejected by the British Americans were ready to fight. The Oregon Treaty was established stating the nation’s concurrence of extending the Oregon Territory-Canadian border along the forty-ninth parallel.


When U.S received Texas in 1845 the fragile relationship between them and Mexico was deteriorated. Polk still not satisfied with the enormous territory he wanted to acquire California (a New-Mexico region). He attempted to purchase California from Mexico and once denied, Polk resorted to a more aggressive and controversial posture. Troops were sent into the area near the Nueces River and Rio Grande. Untied States declared war on Mexico, and even with being supported by poorly trained and ill-disciplined troops U.S controlled of entire southwest.


Under the president James K. Polk the U.S achieved a massive amount of territory. In the Mexican-American War U.S had many victories they defeated Santa Anna’s force near Buena Vista, captured Vera Cruz, won Battle of Cerro Gordo, and captured the Mexican capitol. Santa Anna fled and the war was ended, which lead to the Treaty of Guadalupe-Hidalgo. This treaty included provision stating Mexico recognizing American claims to the area north of the Rio Grande, Mexico exchanged California and New Mexico in return for fifteen million dollars, and the U.S agreed to three million dollars debts Mexico owed to American citizens. Polk still unsatisfied felt U.S desired more since they defeated Mexico in the War, yet Polk had to settle with the one million square miles of territory.


In one term Polk acquired the sum of one million square miles in territory. Going to war against Mexico Polk was taking the best interest of the United States, due to the actuality that the war was to expand the U.S territory. Yes Polk did go against what some Americans wanted like re-open slave states but every one did want an expansion of territory and, Polk exceeded what any of the American could imagine.

3 comments:

Mr. Brush said...

H,

Break up the paragraphs.

MB

Mr. Brush said...

H,
You are becoming a good writer or I should say that you are a good writer and you're becoming a better one. When writing about Polk taking into account the best interest of the U.S. it's sometimes interesting and hugely mature of a writer to question the actions of a President like Polk. Was territorial expansion only good for the U.S. Of course not, due to the issue of slavery. Maybe in the future, if you are supporting a position, try supporting that issue in a small portion of your essay by questioning something "they did" and not simply by stating it. An experienced writer doesn't have all the answers and doesn't believe that what they are supporting is necessarily the whole truth.

B

MB

Toju said...

well mr. brush why don't you try writing this essay?

no response: that's what i THOUGHT.